Thursday, October 18, 2012

Theme 1 - Class System

People were expected to know their place in society and stick to it and moving from one section of the class system to another was frowned upon by those in power.
Workers were beginning to let it be known that they wanted to have a say in what happened to them and did so through strikes and the formation of trade unions to co-ordinate these actions. 
This was a strange idea to those who owned the factories and workplaces, who expected to have complete control over all aspects of their workers lives. The bosses wanted things to stay as they always had been, with them in control of the labour, jobs, conditions and pay. The bosses, being of a higher class than the workers, believed that they knew best and should make decisions for the masses. These were mainly based on how much profit they could make and they rarely considered the welfare of the workers.
In the play itself the main family, the 'Birlings' are wealthy middle class landowners and proprietors of a large factory that was built up by the father of Mr. Birling. He has hopes of gaining a Knighthood, due to his service as a magistrate and as Lord Mayor, which he sees as his way to climb the social ladder to the lower rungs of the aristocracy. This is shown in the way in which he compares this to the mother of his daughter's fiancée, Lady Croft, who is already, part of the aristocracy. Therefore, it can be seen that by marrying Gerald Croft, Sheila is playing a part in the families' social climbing.

Is it fair for the wealthy to control the lives of the poor for their own profit?
Should all people have a say in their lives and their conditions of work?
Do you think that the poor could have done anything other than strike?


Theme 2 - Women in the play.

Women at that time were seen as being delicate, fragile and obedient to their husbands or fathers. The ideal was for those pinched at the waist - slim. Women were trying to get rights the same as men, beginning the Suffrage movement.
Under Roman law, which influenced later British law, husband and wife were regarded as one, with the woman the "possession" of the man. As such, a woman had no legal control over her person, her own land and money, or her children. 

Mrs. Birling - middle class woman of considerable influence - involved in good works, considered a suitable occupation for a lady in society. Women of higher classes did not work, but did only charitable work. This was seen as acceptable as it was a caring role that fitted with the idealised Victorian view, still held then, of women as mothers and carers.
Sheila - follows this path by not working, the only occupation mentioned which she does is shopping.
Daisy/Eva - a working class girl, possibly an orphan, who has to work for a living and is seen to be completely at the mercy of men.

Should women be seen as the property of their husbands?
What effects would this have on women?
How have opinions and laws changed/not changed since that time?

Theme 3 - Sex.

Pre-marital sex frowned upon in the middle and upper classes if you were female, but not if you were male (an attitude still held today in many respects?).
This was due to fear of pregnancy outside of marriage as there was little contraception. Also moral code of the time where ladies were supposed to remain chaste and pure until they married.
According to a double standard of morality, respectable women had to be chaste but respectable men did not, but sex was supposed to be only with working class girls, mainly through use of prostitutes and mistresses, as doing so with their own class would have been breaking the moral codes. This shows that lower class women didn't hold the same status. The upper class men could not fall in love and marry the lower class women though, as this was considered unsuitable. You only married within your class, or preferably higher.
Working class girls were at the mercy of rich men and could find it hard to refuse sex to a man as it was these men who held social and economic power. Many of these women became pregnant and had no resources to care for themselves or their children. Unmarried mothers were frowned upon and in some cases treated as if they were mad and locked up.

Is it right for single mothers to be treated and thought of in this way?
What should be the responsibilities of upper class fathers of these children?
Is it right that men used money & influence to buy lower class women's bodies?
What if this situation was a woman's only chance of surviving if unemployed?
What should happen if the woman becomes pregnant by the upper class man?


Theme 4 - Family.

Father was head of the family and his word was law within the family.
Mothers had some influence in areas, but were less direct in doing so.
Children, even when older and in adulthood were expected to completely obey parents.




Class: We learn a lot about the Birlings' attitude to class.

Responsibility: Each of the characters had a part in Eva's death.





























Sex: We can learn about the disparity between sexes at the time the play is set.Age: The older generation and the younger generation take the Inspector's message in different ways.





Age

The older generation and the younger generation take the Inspector's message in different ways. While Sheila and Eric accept their part in Eva's death and feel huge guilt about it, their parents are unable to admit that they did anything wrong

.

















In An Inspector Calls, the central theme is responsibility. Priestley is interested in our personal responsibility for our own actions and our collective responsibility to society. The play explores the effect of class, age and sex on people's attitudes to responsibility, and shows how prejudice can prevent people from acting responsibly.

The words responsible and responsibility are used by most characters in the play at some point. Each member of the family has a different attitude to responsibility (some more contreversially than others- mr birling, mrs Birling)



            
CharactersAttitudes to the lower class:Attitudes to the upper class:
 At the start of the play, this character was...To this character, Eva was...
Mr Birlingkeen to be knighted to cement his hard-fought rise to the upper classcheap labour
Sheilahappy spending a lot of time in expensive shopssomeone who could be fired out of spite
Geraldprepared to marry Sheila, despite her lower social positiona mistress who could be discarded at will
Ericawkward about his 'public-school-and-Varsity' lifeeasy sex at the end of a drunken night out
Mrs Birlingsocially superior to her husband, and embarrassed at his gaffesa presumptuous upstart


Criticism and interpretation- an inspector calls

Highly successful after its first and subsequent London productions, the play is now considered one of Priestley’s greatest works, and has been subject to a variety of critical interpretations.
After the new wave of social realist theatre in the 1950s and 1960s, the play fell out of fashion, and was dismissed as an example of outdated bourgeois "drawing room" dramas, and became a staple of regional repertory theatre. Following several successful revivals (including Stephen Daldry's 1992 production for the National Theatre), the play was “rediscovered” and hailed as a damning social critique of capitalism and middle-class hypocrisy in the manner of the social realist dramas of Shaw and Ibsen. It has been read as a parable about the destruction of Victorian social values and the disintegration of pre-World War I English society, and Goole’s final speech has been interpreted variously as a quasi-Christian vision of hell and judgement, and as a Socialist party manifesto.
The struggle between the embattled patriarch Arthur Birling and Inspector Goole has been interpreted by many critics as a symbolic confrontation between capitalism and socialism, and arguably demonstrates Priestley's Socialist political critique of the selfishness and moral hypocrisy of middle-class capitalist society. While no single member of the Birling family is solely responsible for Eva's death, together they function as a hermetic class system that exploits neglected vulnerable women, with each example of exploitation leading collectively to Eva's social exclusion, despair and suicide. The play also arguably acts as a critique of Victorian-era notions of middle-class philanthropy towards the poor, which is based on presumptions of the charity-givers' social superiority and severe moral judgement towards the "deserving poor". The romantic idea of gentlemanly chivalry towards "fallen women" is also debunked as being based on male lust and sexual exploitation of the weak by the powerful. In Goole’s final speech, Eva Smith is referred to as a representative for millions of other vulnerable working class people, and can be read as a call to action for English society to take more responsibility for working class people, pre-figuring the development of the post World War II welfare state.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

http://www.aninspectorcalls.com/#/video/

a video with some brief parts from the touring 'an inspector calls theatre production.'

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

How far do you think we are responsible for each other?
Obviously some are responsible for others more than others have responsibilities. For example parents have a big responsibility for new born babies as they no nothing about the world and parents have the responsibility to bring them up well. However in most cases I don't believe we should be responsible for most people as we generally have nothing to do with most people directly. I feel If you have a bit of extra money you are sort of obliged to give slightly to charity even if it is the the smallest amounts. A view I have is that should a world war ever break out in the future and conscription ever be reintroduce I don't feel that it is a necessary responsibility to have to go to war for your country. Clearly some jobs mean that people have responsibilities for others. Jobs such as Doctors, nurses, health and safety checkers etc have responsibilities to look after others.

Friday, October 5, 2012

How far do you think we are responsible for each other?
Obviously some are responsible for others more than others have responsibilities. For example parents have a big responsibility for new born babies as they no nothing about the world and parents have the responsibility to bring them up well. However in most cases I don't believe we should be responsible for most people as                              (dont have a clue what else to write?)